<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>Open Reputation System for Email</title>
  <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:12:16 +1300</lastBuildDate>
  <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
  <generator>Blogware</generator>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Howe (SnertSoft)</dc:creator>
    <title>Reputation for Web sites</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/4/27/1915240.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/4/27/1915240.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:50:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>While reading SlashDot, they had an interesting reference to an article stating that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aviransplace.com/index.php/archives/2006/04/26/most-web-users-unable-to-spot-spyware/&quot;&gt;65% of all web surfs would be repeatly infected&lt;/a&gt; by spyware, adware, etc. It refers to this web site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siteadvisor.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.siteadvisor.com/&lt;/a&gt; that essentially provides an interesting quiz and a reputation service for web sites through a web browser plugin. I thought it loosely related to our goals and note worthy. (BTW I scored 6/8).&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ExistingSystems">Existing Systems</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen (Outbound Index)</dc:creator>
    <title>China Requires Registration of Email Servers</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/4/15/1886676.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/4/15/1886676.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:26:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>The oddly titled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2154063/china-outlaws-outlook&quot;&gt;China Outlaws Outlook&lt;/a&gt;&quot; actually details news of a recent law enacted by China that would require outbound email server operators to register their IP addresses 20 days prior to beginning to use them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Assumedly, the Chinese government will offer an IP DNSWL (DNS White List) of registered servers and inbound mail server operators worldwide would have the option of rejecting mail from any other IP in China. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This may not occur, if the rest of the world becomes concerned about censorship issues. For example, what if the Governor of each US state selected which outbound email servers could operate from within his state, or the Senate Majority Leader could specify what American IP addresses could send outgoing mail. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From a fear / punishment and censorship perspective, the provision in the new Chinese law that requires mail server operators to keep a record of all mail incoming and outgoing for 60 days is in my opinion pretty significant.&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/EmailReputationNews">Email Reputation News</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="server" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=server">server</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="registration" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=registration">registration</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="licensed" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=licensed">licensed</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="law" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=law">law</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="China" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=China">China</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="email" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=email">email</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="antispam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=antispam">antispam</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Howe (SnertSoft)</dc:creator>
    <title>SIQ protocol IETF Internet draft 03 now available for review</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/3/25/1838601.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/3/25/1838601.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:53:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>The latest &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-iar-howe-siq-03.txt&quot;&gt;SIQ protocol Internet draft&lt;/a&gt; is available online with the IETF.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its already been suggested that the change in ...</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ProtocolsorDataTransferMethods">Protocols or Data Transfer Methods</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen</dc:creator>
    <title>Packing a domain and IPv6 lookup into a DNS packet</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/2/28/1786532.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/2/28/1786532.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:08:00 +1300</pubDate>
    <description>Reference material for agenda item at Meng Wong&#39;s reputation mini-summit Feb 27th 2006: &quot;Overloading DNS&quot; with reputation data - what  are some of the limitations and advantages etc. 

This is a summary of the 4 emails I (ANTHONY HOWE) wrote on the 7th Jan 2006 to 
ASRG-IAR in response to John Levine&#39;s comment about using DNS to do 
reputation like other DNS based blacklists:</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ProtocolsorDataTransferMethods">Protocols or Data Transfer Methods</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen (Outbound Index)</dc:creator>
    <title>Cheap Rides for Internet Abusers &amp; Related Data Points for Email Reputation</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/2/4/1742908.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2006/2/4/1742908.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:02:00 +1300</pubDate>
    <description>&quot;One of the measures of interest is the size of the &quot;free license to abuse&quot; window. Is the window between detectable illicit action and termination long enough to get off a profitable phishing or spamming run? Is the initial screening process left so open that numerous such incidents are going to keep occuring? Ok, so noted in the service provider&#39;s &lt;B&gt;Vetting Effectiveness Profile&lt;/B&gt;.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ReputationCollectors">Reputation Collectors</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="whitelist" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=whitelist">whitelist</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="reputation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=reputation">reputation</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="nameserver" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=nameserver">nameserver</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="email" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=email">email</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="blacklist" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=blacklist">blacklist</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="antispam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=antispam">antispam</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="accreditation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=accreditation">accreditation</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen (Outbound Index)</dc:creator>
    <title>Article by Vipul Prakesh and Adam O&#39;Donnell</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/12/4/1433362.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/12/4/1433362.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 05:09:00 +1300</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;h4&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;amp;pa=showpage&amp;amp;pid=346&quot;&gt;Leveraging the power of communities and reputations can be an effective weapon against spam&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;
http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;amp;pa=showpage&amp;amp;pid=346

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;amp;pa=showpage&amp;amp;pid=346&amp;amp;page=1&quot; class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;1: Pervasiveness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;amp;pa=showpage&amp;amp;pid=346&amp;amp;page=2&quot; class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;2: Community-Based Filter Training&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;amp;pa=showpage&amp;amp;pid=346&amp;amp;page=3&quot; class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;3: Emergence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;amp;pa=showpage&amp;amp;pid=346&amp;amp;page=4&quot; class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;4: Fingerprinting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;amp;pa=showpage&amp;amp;pid=346&amp;amp;page=5&quot; class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;5: Reputation&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/EmailReputationNews">Email Reputation News</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen</dc:creator>
    <title>DCC Reputation</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/11/9/1362290.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/11/9/1362290.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:21:00 +1300</pubDate>
    <description>DCC offers an IP based reputation score given as the percentage of
&quot;bulk&quot; mail seen from that IP. The IP reputation scoring is only
available on the proprietary commercial version of DCC, according to&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/reputations.html&quot;&gt; http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/reputations.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ReputationCollectors">Reputation Collectors</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="collector" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=collector">collector</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>W. Brandon Phillips</dc:creator>
    <title>Reputation News</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/10/4/1277098.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/10/4/1277098.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 08:10:00 +1300</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Here are links to recent press regarding LashBack&#39;s unsubscribe repuation services:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma color=maroon size=1&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: maroon; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;(Press Release) &lt;FONT face=Tahoma color=red size=1&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: red; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;&lt;A title=http://www.lashback.com/unsubscribe_compliance_certification.htm href=&quot;http://www.lashback.com/unsubscribe_compliance_certification.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.lashback.com/unsubscribe_compliance_certification.htm&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma color=maroon size=1&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: maroon; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;(ClickZ) &lt;FONT face=Tahoma color=red size=1&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: red; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;&lt;A title=http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3550106 href=&quot;http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3550106&quot;&gt;http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3550106&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma color=red size=1&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: red; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = &quot;urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office&quot; /&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma color=maroon size=1&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: maroon; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;(DMNews) &lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;&lt;A title=http://www.dmnews.com/cgi-bin/artprevbot.cgi?article_id=34140&amp;amp;dest=article href=&quot;http://www.dmnews.com/cgi-bin/artprevbot.cgi?article_id=34140&amp;amp;dest=article&quot;&gt;http://www.dmnews.com/cgi-bin/artprevbot.cgi?article_id=34140&amp;amp;dest=article&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma color=maroon size=2&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: maroon; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;(BtoB.com) &lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=1&gt;&lt;SPAN style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma&quot;&gt;&lt;A title=http://www.btobonline.com/article.cms?articleId=25525 href=&quot;http://www.btobonline.com/article.cms?articleId=25525&quot;&gt;http://www.btobonline.com/article.cms?articleId=25525&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/EmailReputationNews">Email Reputation News</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen (Outbound Index)</dc:creator>
    <title>Phishing Site Take Down Research Project</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/9/17/1233657.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/9/17/1233657.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:30:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>The following is presented to encourage comments and discussion about a
short research project designed to illumiate the existing state ...</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ReputationCollectors">Reputation Collectors</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Howe (SnertSoft)</dc:creator>
    <title>CNET: Web site gives e-mail senders a reputation</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/9/9/1208509.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/9/9/1208509.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:13:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>This article appeared last week on CNET News&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Web+site+gives+e-mail+senders+a+reputation/2100-7355_3-5844408.html?tag=nefd.top&quot;&gt;Web site gives e-mail senders a reputation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It talks about CipherTrust&#39;s data collection appliances and their new
TrustedSource Web site which provides reputation information based on
that data.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/EmailReputationNews">Email Reputation News</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Howe (SnertSoft)</dc:creator>
    <title>SIQ protocol IETF Internet draft 02 now available for review</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/27/1171338.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/27/1171338.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:01:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>Earlier this week I posted the SIQ protocol draft 02 with the IETF and its now available online:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-iar-howe-siq-02.txt&quot;&gt;http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-iar-howe-siq-02.txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;
Abstract&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: right;&quot;&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The Server Index Query (SIQ) protocol is intended to provide a&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; standard means by which a mail exchange (MX) server can query&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; one or more external services for scoring based on facts or&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; reputation of an&amp;nbsp; IP/domain pair. This document specifies the&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; communication protocol&amp;nbsp; used to transmit the IP/domain query&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; and return the query response.&amp;nbsp; The implementation, correctness&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; of results, and/or management of SIQ servers is beyond the&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; scope of this document.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
This draft incorporates much of the technical feedback given to me by
Eric Allmann after the Sendmail Meeting of The Minds in San Francisco
in July.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So far, Eric has been the only one to provide any actual&amp;nbsp;
technical commentary and impressions about this protocol since it was
first submitted to the IETF this time last year. I had hoped this past
year to have had more feedback about SIQ or alternatives through ASRG
IAR subgroup, which initially appeared to be the appropriate place for
such discussions, but alas it appears that the IAR mailing list members
have gone dumb through lack any interesting &amp;amp; fiery controversy
worth arguing about. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I hope some of the more techinical amoung you will review it and post
comments and/or alternatives here. I think its in the Internet&#39;s best
interest that those interested in reputation systems and services
develop an open and public protocol that can be used to implement the
communication infrastructure for reputation query clients, caches, and
servers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ProtocolsorDataTransferMethods">Protocols or Data Transfer Methods</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>W. Brandon Phillips</dc:creator>
    <title>LashBack&#39;s Unsubscribe Blacklist Goes Live</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/20/1151790.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/20/1151790.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 02:57:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;LashBack has introduced a UBL (Unsubscribe Black List) available for public use. The LashBack UBL lists the IPs of senders judged abusive for sending email to addresses harvested from suppression lists.
</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen (Outbound Index)</dc:creator>
    <title>Industry Classification Index for Email Sources</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/8/1115296.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/8/1115296.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 03:40:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;I&gt;Excerpt&lt;/I&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Classification may be the work of Reputation Collectors, or of Reputation Aggregators, or perhaps ideally an open system that can handle a &quot;source&quot; record. Source is who put this record in, who thinks the classification is X. 
&lt;P&gt;
You can then choose which source(s) you will use/trust. You could selectively drop (ignore) sources you find you don&#39;t want to trust. You could set up your own interpretation / voting:
&lt;P&gt;
 - Source &quot;ReSpam&quot; says this sender is a school
&lt;P&gt;
 - Source &quot;Montgomery Report&quot; says this sender allows anonymous webmail signups and has no outbound rate limiting.
&lt;P&gt;
I am not suggestion that this classification system become a reputation system unto itself, with evidence files or an unlimited number of data points. Rather that it stick to a narrowly defined area of &quot;classifications useful in differentiating characteristics of email sources.&quot; Other reputation collectors could reference the ID or classification numbers in this system if they wished to, and attach other data points within their own databases.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ReputationCollectors">Reputation Collectors</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/Aggregators">Aggregators</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="aggregator" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=aggregator">aggregator</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="classification" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=classification">classification</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="collector" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=collector">collector</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="SIC" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=SIC">SIC</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="industry" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=industry">industry</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="spam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=spam">spam</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="services" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=services">services</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="repuation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=repuation">repuation</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="email" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=email">email</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="antispam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=antispam">antispam</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen (Outbound Index)</dc:creator>
    <title>Meng Wong&#39;s Karma project</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/7/1113100.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/7/1113100.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:45:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>&amp;nbsp;Meng Wong has a prototype project called Karma - so far I have found&lt;a href=&quot;http://spf.pobox.com/aspen.html&quot;&gt; this page on it from July ...</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/Aggregators">Aggregators</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ProtocolsorDataTransferMethods">Protocols or Data Transfer Methods</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/EmailReputationNews">Email Reputation News</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="spam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=spam">spam</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="repuation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=repuation">repuation</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="protocols" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=protocols">protocols</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="protocol" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=protocol">protocol</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="karma" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=karma">karma</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="email" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=email">email</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="antispam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=antispam">antispam</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Steward</dc:creator>
    <title>SIQ Protocol for Domain+IP reputation queries</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/6/1112303.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/6/1112303.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:45:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>The present generation &quot;domain plus IP&quot; email reputation query / response SIQ protocol has been in use in production mail servers since July 2003. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www1.ietf.org/proceedings_new/04nov/slides/ASRG-1/sld1.htm&quot;&gt;This succinct slide presentation&lt;/a&gt; was made at the ASRG &quot;Identity, Authentication and Reputation&quot; session of the 61st IETF meeting held in Washington DC November 2004.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The SIQ protocol has MTA &lt;a href=&quot;http://outboundindex.org/tools.html&quot;&gt;query clients&lt;/a&gt; available for sendmail, postfix and exchange, plus command line query clients for *nix and win.&lt;br&gt; </description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ProtocolsorDataTransferMethods">Protocols or Data Transfer Methods</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="protocols" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=protocols">protocols</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="plus" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=plus">plus</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="reputation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=reputation">reputation</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="ip" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=ip">ip</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="karma" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=karma">karma</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="siq" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=siq">siq</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="domain" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=domain">domain</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="protocol" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=protocol">protocol</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="services" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=services">services</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="repuation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=repuation">repuation</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="email" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=email">email</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="antispam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=antispam">antispam</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen (Outbound Index)</dc:creator>
    <title>Brains or Brawn: Email Reputation Aggregators</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/1/1094944.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/1/1094944.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 153, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt; Aggregation is in my opinion a must.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://adl.blogware.com/oi_dashboard.gif&quot; target=&quot;fig&quot;&gt;Blacklists alone will miss 40% of the spam we see.&lt;/a&gt; Requirements for passing &quot;authentication only&quot; are easily met by spammers. Purely statistical methods do not achieve 100% accuracy because the human judgement and research currently done by the most trusted black and white list operators is needed as an adjunct.&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/Aggregators">Aggregators</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="spam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=spam">spam</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="services" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=services">services</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="repuation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=repuation">repuation</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="email" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=email">email</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="antispam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=antispam">antispam</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen</dc:creator>
    <title>Reactive vs Predictive Email Reputation Collectors</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/1/1094522.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/8/1/1094522.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 07:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>My favored predictive collectors focus on factors that can be measured before the message is accepted, even before the first spam from a new run is accepted. I also like predictive collectors that focus on positive or &quot;good&quot; characteristics rather than characteristics of &quot;bad&quot; senders.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/ReputationCollectors">Reputation Collectors</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="spam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=spam">spam</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="services" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=services">services</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="repuation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=repuation">repuation</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="email" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=email">email</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="antispam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=antispam">antispam</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>April Lorenzen (Outbound Index)</dc:creator>
    <title>Email Reputation Business Models: Free, Fee or Both?</title>
    <link>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/7/29/1085912.html</link>
    <guid>http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/_archives/2005/7/29/1085912.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:52:00 +1200</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);&quot;&gt;CONCLUSIONS:&lt;/span&gt; I predict that any large scale high quality reputation system will offer limited functionality free access with clear value distinctions for upgrading to fee based services. I also suggest&amp;nbsp; financial support for individuals who currently donate their daily &quot;email research&quot; time to the community will be money well-spent by reputation system Aggregators. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; I expect to see financially rewarding opportunities opening up in the near future for individual anti-spam researchers who are &lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 153, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;paid for access to their daily &quot;Reputation Collection&quot; work&lt;/span&gt; yet remain independent rather than being &quot;bought&quot; as an employee for just one anti-spam service firm.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br</description>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/BusinessModels">Business Models</category>
    
    
    <ent:cloud ent:href="">
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="email" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=email">email</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="spam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=spam">spam</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="services" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=services">services</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="repuation" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=repuation">repuation</ent:topic>
    
    <ent:topic ent:id="antispam" ent:href="http://ors.blogs4change.org/blog/cmd=search_keyword/k=antispam">antispam</ent:topic>
    
    </ent:cloud>
    
    
    
  </item>
  
</channel>
</rss>
